diff --git a/Flat-Rate vs Per-Solve CAPTCHA Solving.-.md b/Flat-Rate vs Per-Solve CAPTCHA Solving.-.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9b7f22b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Flat-Rate vs Per-Solve CAPTCHA Solving.-.md	
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+CapSkip's API was built to emulate the request format of major CAPTCHA-solving services. What this means, tools and scripts that currently target other services are able to point at CapSkip with minimal changes and no coding.
+
+Classic image and text CAPTCHAs remain extremely common, from login forms to registration flows. CapSkip recognizes thousands of image CAPTCHA variants on your own hardware, typically in about a tenth of a second. That kind of speed matters the moment you handle large volumes.
+
+GeeTest challenges are notoriously awkward for automation,  [learn More](https://svoiartisti.Officehost.ru/profile/jaydentaverner) so having a solver that covers them is a real plus. CapSkip solves GeeTest on your machine, so workflows that depend on these sites keep running when the puzzle appears.
+
+Data collection remains among the most common reasons people reach for a CAPTCHA solver. A single blocked request will halt an entire run, so clearing challenges on the fly keeps throughput predictable. CapSkip slots into these workflows cleanly.
+
+Automated browsers leave signals that detection systems watch for, so combining careful automation hygiene with reliable CAPTCHA solving counts. CapSkip handles the challenge half so you focus on the browser side.
+
+Parallel solving is the point at which self-hosted solving really pays off. Because you have no external throttle tied to your bill, teams can spread work across numerous threads and keep keep costs flat.
+
+Under the hood, reCAPTCHA v3 assigns a risk score based on watched signals rather than a single click. Producing a usable score takes tooling designed for that approach, which is what CapSkip is built for.
+
+Headless browsers expose fingerprints that anti-bot systems look at, so pairing careful browser setup with dependable CAPTCHA solving counts. CapSkip covers the solving half while you concentrate on the browser side.
+
+Web scraping remains one of the top reasons teams adopt a CAPTCHA solver. A single blocked page will stall an whole run, so solving challenges on the fly keeps throughput steady. CapSkip fits such workflows cleanly.
+
+Inventory monitoring over dozens of retailers means constant hits, and plenty of of those pages guard checkout with CAPTCHAs. Solving the challenges on your hardware keeps the data fresh without spiraling costs.
+
+On top of the API, CapSkip comes with SDKs plus sample code that cut down integration time. Rather than hand-rolling low-level HTTP calls, developers are able to use prebuilt helpers for common languages.
+
+One frequent misstep is simply picking every solver as interchangeable. Line up the solver to the CAPTCHA types, the volume, and the budget - CapSkip covers the common types at a flat rate, which suits most everyday projects.
+
+Broad language support means CapSkip handle CAPTCHAs across a wide range of locales, which matters when the sites are international. This coverage keeps solve rates steady regardless of where the target is based.
+
+GeeTest puzzles are notoriously awkward for automation, which is why running a tool that supports them helps a lot. CapSkip handles GeeTest on your machine, so workflows that rely on these sites keep running whenever the challenge shows up.
+
+A Python codebase projects have a simple path with CapSkip, which mirrors the request format of popular solving services. Often, this means aiming existing code at CapSkip with little effort - no rewrite.
+
+reCAPTCHA v2 remains among the most widespread challenges on the web, covering the familiar checkbox to invisible and  [www.capskip.Com](http://Nutbox-Collection.de/index.php?title=Why_Flat-Rate_Beats_Pay-Per-Solve_CAPTCHA_Pricing) callback variants. CapSkip solves all of these locally quickly, which means your automation will not grind to a halt whenever one shows up. Because it mirrors common solver APIs, wiring it in tends to be painless.
+
+Accessibility testing frequently bumps into CAPTCHAs when checking contact forms. Instead of dropping these checks, teams have CapSkip clear the challenge locally so test runs remain thorough and consistent.
+
+One of the biggest benefits of running on your own hardware is cost. Traditional services bill per solve, so your costs rise as volume increases. CapSkip uses flat-rate pricing and uncapped solves, so you can scale without watching the meter.
+
+Data control is a genuine issue when each challenge is sent to a third-party service. Because CapSkip runs locally, no challenge data departs your machine, so sensitive projects stay on your own systems. If you handle regulated data, that is often the clincher.
+
+Data control is a genuine issue when each challenge is sent to a third-party service. With CapSkip, no challenge data leaves your hardware, so private workflows remain contained. If you handle regulated work, this can be the clincher.
+
+Good docs plus examples make adoption faster. Between the setup guide to the API reference and the FAQ, most questions are answered before you ask, so the team puts time on shipping instead of troubleshooting.
+
+Solid documentation and tutorials shorten onboarding faster. Between the setup guide to the API reference and the FAQ, most questions have clear answers without you ask, so your team puts time on shipping rather than firefighting.
\ No newline at end of file